Published April 2025
By: Reanna V., teen author
Highlights:
- Recently I was a participant in a national conference trying to understand the role and future of digital technology in positive youth development and youth mental health.
- This blog joins the Youth Digital Future Series to highlight the session videos from that conference with summaries and reflections from youth voices.
- One session during the conference featured a live-streamed conversation between Drs. Candice Odgers and Jonathan Haidt about research-based insights on social media’s impact on youth, and this post highlights the differences, common ground, and solutions pertaining to their debate about social media regulation.
The Debate: Research, Risks & Realities
The alarming rise in youth mental health issues has gained global attention and sparked debates about root causes and potential solutions. At the heart of the discussion lies a controversial question: What role does social media play? This question took center stage during a recent facilitated discussion featuring Drs. Candice Odgers and Jonathan Haidt, who presented differing yet insightful perspectives on the issue.
Odgers’ Perspective: Safer Online Spaces for Youth
Dr. Odgers focused on the complexity of the youth mental health crisis, noting that over 20% of adolescents are struggling with mental health issues. Despite a recent decline in youth suicide rates, the numbers remain alarmingly high with over 1.2 million children having lost a parent to suicide or overdose between 2010 and 2021. While acknowledging potential risks associated with social media, Dr. Odgers highlighted its nuanced role.
However, Odgers emphasized that youth seeking help or conversations online complicate the correlation between social media use and negative mental health outcomes. She called for better-designed studies and a shift from restricting technology to building safer online spaces for youth. Beyond social media, she urged that the broader mental health crisis in families and communities cannot be ignored.
Haidt’s Perspective: Age-Appropriate Digital Environments
Dr. Haidt approached the issue from a cross-cultural perspective. He pointed to trends where anxiety and depression surged in the 2010s, especially among teenage girls. However, these trends varied across countries and cultures, with stronger effects observed in less community-oriented environments. He also focused on isolating social media’s impact, arguing for “unblending” studies that focus on specific platforms, genders, or mental health outcomes in order to uncover stronger correlations. His analysis revealed a 0.2 correlation when isolating data from girls specifically, a significant signal that broad studies often miss. Dr. Haidt proposed stricter regulations to mitigate these harms, such as delaying social media access until age 16, implementing age-appropriate digital environments, and promoting “phone-free” schools.
Key Points of Agreement & Divergence
While Odgers and Haidt often diverged in their interpretations of the data, they found common ground in acknowledging the limitations of current research, particularly “blender studies” that lump diverse digital experiences together.
Their disagreements largely stemmed from differing interpretations of social media’s role in exacerbating mental health issues. Dr. Odgers stressed the importance of balancing risks with the benefits youth derive from online spaces, such as finding a supportive community and accessing resources. Dr. Haidt, on the other hand, underscored the harms driven by for-profit platforms and advocated for stricter regulations to safeguard against exploitation and harm.
Moving Forward
The discussion concluded with a call to action. Dr. Odgers advocated for mixed-method research that involves youth voices, shifting the narrative from restrictions to creating safer, enriching digital environments. Dr. Haidt proposed collective action, such as testing phone-free schools or increasing recess time, to prioritize childhood development over digital engagement.
This facilitated discussion offered a nuanced view of the complex relationship between social media and youth mental health. While the debate continues, one thing is clear: addressing this issue requires collaboration between researchers, policymakers, educators, and young people themselves. By creating informed, supportive digital environments, we can help ensure a healthier, more connected future for the next generation.
If you have any comments or questions about this post, please email [email protected]. Please visit the Youth-Nex Homepage for up to date information about the work happening at the center.
